M/S.eagle Apparel Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle-Ii(1), Chennai 600 034
High Court
21 Dec 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.eagle Apparel Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle-Ii(1), Chennai 600 034
Date of order
21 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.eagle Apparel Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle-Ii(1), Chennai 600 034, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
M/s.Eagle Apparel Private Limited,No.15, Race Course Road,Guindy, Chennai 600 032. Appellant Vs.
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle-II(1), Chennai 600 034. Respondent
Tax Case filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 5.10.2007 made in ITANo.733/Mds/2006.
Appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner ofIncome Tax, (Appeals) – XI, Chennai dated 12.10.2005 made inITA.No.TR.No.337/2003-04/ITA No. 243/04-05 for the AssessmentYear 2000 – 01.
& as Appeal against the order passed by the AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax Company Circle II (1), Chennai-34dated 12.11.2003 made in PAN/GIR.AAACE 1453E for theAssessment Year 2000-01.
For Respondent : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, Senior Standing Counsel
Learned counsel Mr.M.P.Senthilkumar has submitted thatthe Assessee has approached the Department for settlement ofthe dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 and therefore,sought for permission of the court to withdraw the present TaxCase.
2. The learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr.KarthikRanganathan appearing for the Respondent/Revenue has no
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
objection for the same.
3. Accordingly, the Tax Case is dismissed as withdrawn.No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII)//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssk.To1. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle-II(1), Chennai 600 034. 3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XI, Chennai.4.The Assistant commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle II (1), Chennai – 34.+1cc to Mr.Philip George, Advocate, S.R.No. 42401T.C.No.1498 of 2008LN(CO)GN(18/01/2021)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.