In M/S.german Remedies Ltd.mumbai v. Dy.commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of the above. ....
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3069 OF 2004
WRIT PETITION NO.3069 OF 2004
WRIT PETITION NO.3069 OF 2004
M/s.German Remedies Ltd.Mumbai .. Petitioner
V/s
Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax,
Circle 6(3), Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.K.Gopal for the Petitioner.
Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.A.S.Rao for the Respondents.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 18.01.2005.
DATE : 18.01.2005.
DATE : 18.01.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for the Petitioner has brought to our
notice that the Respondents by their affidavit in reply
dated 17.1.2005 have disclosed the reasons for
re-opening the assessment under Section 148 of the
Income Tax Act. In view thereof, the learned Counsel
for the Petitioners states that within a period of two
weeks from today, the Petitioner will file its
objections with the Respondents. The learned Counsel
for the Respondents states that the Respondents will
decide the said objections within a period of three
weeks thereafter. Writ Petition stands disposed of in
terms of the above.
....
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue