M/S.honest Trading Co.pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance
High Court
24 Dec 1997 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
M/S.honest Trading Co.pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance
Date of order
24 Dec 1997
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.honest Trading Co.pvt.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- M/S.HONEST TRADING CO.PVT.LTD.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 39 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
M/S.HONEST TRADING CO.PVT.LTD.
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR RK PATEL for Petitioner
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and �� MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 24/12/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K. Abichandani, J.)
�Heard both the sides. The following two questions of law arise from the order of the Tribunal.
"(1).�Whether on the facts and circumstances of
the case the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 65961/- paid
to staff and workers in addition to Bonus paid to
them under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 ?
(2).�Whether the Tribunal was justified in law
in holding that the said payment were in the
nature of Ex-gratia and were not "necessitated"
by the business needs, the disallowance was
justified accordingly ?"
�The Tribunal is, therefore, directed to furnish
statement of case in respect of the aforesaid questions under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, expeditiously. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no
order as to costs.
************
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.