Case Law › High Court › M/S.j.r.enterprises Appellant v. Dy.comm...

M/S.j.r.enterprises Appellant v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 12(3),Mumbai & Anr. Respondents

High Court 19 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Oct 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In M/S.j.r.enterprises Appellant v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 12(3),Mumbai & Anr. Respondents, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: We accede to his request and allow the appeal to bewithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 507 OF 2003 M/s.J.R.EnterprisesAppellant vs.Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 12(3),Mumbai & anr.Respondents Mr.A.K.Jasani for the appellant. Mr.V.H. Kantharia for the respondents. P.C. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 19th October 2004 Mr.A.K.Jasani, the learned counsel for theappellant submits that he has instructions to withdrawthe appeal. 2. We accede to his request and allow the appeal to bewithdrawn. 3. Refund of court fee as per law. (R.M. LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.