In M/S.jyotichand Bhaichand Saraf v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circue 1(1), Pune, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The present appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1194 OF 2011
M/s.Jyotichand Bhaichand Saraf
Versus
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circue 1(1), Pune
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar for the appellant.Mr.Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.N.A. Kazi for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ.
DATE : 10[th] January 2013
P.C. :
1.Counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal as the miscellaneous application filed by the appellant has been allowed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by its order dated 28[th] June 2012.
2.The present appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Refund of court fee as per rules.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue