Case LawHigh Court › M/S.kashiram Omprakash v. Commissioner O...

M/S.kashiram Omprakash v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 05 Sep 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
M/S.kashiram Omprakash v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
05 Sep 2001
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.kashiram Omprakash v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- M/s.KASHIRAM OMPRAKASH Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 267 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Sd/- and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- M/s.KASHIRAM OMPRAKASH Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 267 of 1992 MR KH KAJI for Applicant. MR AKIL QURESHI FOR MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 05/09/2001 (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �Heard Mr.K.H.Kaji, learned Counsel for the applicant-assessee and Mr.Akil Qureshi for Mr.M.R.Bhatt for the respondent-revenue. 2�Mr.Kaji states under instructions from the applicant that the applicant does not press this Reference as the final order pursuant to the remand order passed by the Tribunal has been in favour of the applicant-assessee. In view of the above, we dispose of this Reference as not pressed with no order as to costs. ���Sd/-��Sd/- ��(M.S.Shah, J)� (D.A.Mehta, J) m.m.bhatt
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan