Case LawHigh Court › M/S.kimovanti Pvt.ltd v. I.t.o. Ward (I)...

M/S.kimovanti Pvt.ltd v. I.t.o. Ward (I) Mumbai

High Court 10 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.kimovanti Pvt.ltd v. I.t.o. Ward (I) Mumbai
Date of order
10 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.kimovanti Pvt.ltd v. I.t.o. Ward (I) Mumbai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.571 OF 2005 M/s.Kimovanti Pvt.Ltd... AppellantsVersusI.T.O. Ward (I) Mumbai.. RespondentMr.K.Gopal for appellants. CORAM :SWATANTER KUMAR, CJ. &A.P.DESHPANDE, J.DATE:10th September 2008 P.C. .We have heard the learned Counsel forappellant. We are afraid that no question oflaw, much less any substantial question of lawarises for consideration in the present case.The findings recorded by the Tribunal areprimarily based upon the factual matrix that allthrough out the Assessee has taken a stand or itwas implied that it has followed mercantilestandard. However, it is brought to our notice that the appellant was following cash system ofaccounting and thus he had already offered T.D.S.amount and the interest accrued for the relevantyear for tax. We are unable to disturb thisfinding. However, it is open to the assessee toraise this question in subsequent case inaccordance with law. No merits and dismissedaccordingly. ( CHIEF JUSTICE ) (A.P.Deshpande, J).
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan