Case LawHigh Court › M/S.k.k.alufoil… v. The Income Tax Offic...

M/S.k.k.alufoil… v. The Income Tax Officer 12(2)(3)…

High Court 19 Mar 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.k.k.alufoil… v. The Income Tax Officer 12(2)(3)…
Date of order
19 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S.k.k.alufoil… v. The Income Tax Officer 12(2)(3)…, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 522 OF 2012 M/s.K.K.Alufoil… Appellant v/s The Income Tax Officer 12(2)(3)… Respondent Mr.Nitesh Joshi i/by Mint & Conferers for the appellant.Mr.P.C. Chhotaray for the respondent. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2014 P. C. : 1Heard both sides. 2We are of the view that the Tribunal committed no error in rendering the findings concurrent with that of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Each one of them held that for enabling the appellant assessee to place on record the certificates proving deduction of tax at source, the provisions of sub- section (14) of Section 155 of the Income Tax Act would have to be invoked. The assessee could not have invoked the provisions of sub-section (14) of Section 155 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In the given facts and circumstances and which have been noted in paragraph 2 of the order of the Tribunal. For all these reasons, this appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is accordingly dismissed. (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan