M/S.krishna Textiles - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S
High Court
12 Oct 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
M/S.krishna Textiles - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S
Date of order
12 Oct 2006
Assessment year(s)
1988-89, 1987-88
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.krishna Textiles - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 5[Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ]? =========================================================M/S.KRISHNA TEXTILES - Applicant(s)VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s) =========================================================Appearance :MR MANISH J SHAHfor Applicant(s) :...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 9 of 1997With INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 10 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARGHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
=========================================================1[Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed ]to see the judgment ?
2To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3[Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy ]of the judgment ?of the judgment ?
Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the 4constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?
5[Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ]?
=========================================================M/S.KRISHNA TEXTILES - Applicant(s)VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s)
=========================================================Appearance :MR MANISH J SHAHfor Applicant(s) : 1,MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1,=========================================================
CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
Date : 12/10/2006
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG)
1. This order shall dispose of I.T.R. No. 9/97 and I.T.R. No. 10/97.
2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench “C”, at the instance of the assessee has referred the following questions for opinion of this Court in both the Income Tax References No. 9 and 10 of 1997, which arise out of ITA No. 507/Ahd/1993 relating to Assessment Year 1988-89 and ITA No. 1837/Ahd/94 relating to Assessment Year 1987-88 respectively.
1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the Excise Duty collected by the assessee on grey fabrics was in the nature of trading receipts and hence taxable u/s. 43-B of the Act?
2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the bank guarantee furnished by the
assessee which was taken by the assessee by depositing the amount in bank fixed deposit as margin money did
ITR/9/1997
3/4
not tantamount to actual payment and so Section 43-B is applicable?
3. In relation to the very same assessee, identical
questions were referred in ITR 106/96. The said
questions have been answered by us in
affirmative holding that the excise duty
collected by assessee on grey fabrics was in
the nature of trading receipt and was taxable
under Section 43-B of the Act and that bank
guarantee furnished by the assessee which was taken by the assessee by depositing the amount in bank fixed deposit as margin money did not
amount to actual payment, therefore, Section 43-B is applicable. In view of the decision on identical issue between the same parties, we are
not required to enter into the details of each
and everything. Both the questions are answered
against the interest of the assessee and in
favour of the Revenue. The References stand disposed of. No costs.
[R.S. GARG, J.]
[D.H. WAGHELA, J.]
pirzada/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.