M/S.loksons Pvt.ltd., 2Nd Floor, Ramchandra Bldg v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 5(4), Bombay
High Court
15 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.loksons Pvt.ltd., 2Nd Floor, Ramchandra Bldg v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 5(4), Bombay
Date of order
15 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.loksons Pvt.ltd., 2Nd Floor, Ramchandra Bldg v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 5(4), Bombay, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Reference stands disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE 10 OF 1995
M/s.Loksons Pvt.Ltd.,2nd Floor, Ramchandra Bldg,200, L.T.Marg, Bombay-2.Vs.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 5(4), Bombay.
..Applicant
..Respondent
Mr.P.J.Pardiwala i/b. Kanga & Co.for the Applicant.Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for theRespondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.DATE : 15TH JULY, 2008
JUDGMENT (PER : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
1.By this Reference, the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Bombay has referred the following
substantial question of law:
2.The above question of law pertains to
remitting back the advance received for supply of
goods by the Assessee.
sending the aforesaid 32,09,895 UAE Dirhams, the said
three permission Numbers are:
the rate which was prevailing in July/August,1979 when
the amount was received by the Assessee.
5.The Assessee had claimed the aforesaid excess
foreign exchange and the Appellant had no control over
the same.
7.
Mr.Pardiwala contended that with regard to the
deduction on account of exchange loss of
Rs.65,54,930/- ought to be set aside.
8.Mr.Vimal Gupta, the learned Counsel appearing
Revenue. The Reference stands disposed of
accordingly.
(A.V.NIRGUDE,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.