In M/S.magna Laboratories (Gujarat) P. Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - Ix, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Issue: Admit on the following substantial question of law. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in declining to condone the delay of 107 days in filing the appeal and dismissing the appeal ?" 2.By consent, the delay of 107 days in filing the appeal before the I...
Decision: The appeal filed by the assessee being ITA No.1119/Mum/09 relating to assessment year 2005-05 is restored to the file of the Tribunal for a decision on merits and in accordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4722 OF 2010
M/s.Magna Laboratories (Gujarat) P. Limited..Appellant.
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - IX
..Respondent.
Mr.Shashi Tulsiyani i/by Sutapa Saha for the appellant.Mr.N.A. Kazi for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 20[th] July, 2011.
1.Heard. Admit on the following substantial question of law.
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in declining to condone the delay of 107 days in filing the appeal and dismissing the appeal ?"
2.By consent, the delay of 107 days in filing the appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is condoned. The order of the Tribunal dated 26th February 2010 is quashed and set aside. The appeal filed by the assessee being ITA No.1119/Mum/09 relating to assessment year 2005-05 is restored to the file of the Tribunal for a decision on merits and in accordance with law.
3.The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.