M/S.mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. The Cit City-Ii
High Court
03 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. The Cit City-Ii
Date of order
03 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
1991-92, 1990-91
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. The Cit City-Ii, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the same reason, we set aside the order dated 14.9.2004 in both the appeals and restore the appeals to the file of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
KJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.93 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.94 OF 2005
M/s.Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., ..Appellant
Versus
The CIT City-II ..Respondent
----
Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the appellant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 3rd March 2008.
PC
1. These two appeals are in respect of A.Y.1991-92
and 1992-93 which were numbered as ITA
Nos.7262/MUM/96 & 7263/MUM/96 and disposed off by a
common order dated 14.9.2004 alongwith two other
appeals being ITA Nos.7086 & 7087/MUM/97. We may
make it clear that the ITA Nos.7086 & 7087/MUM/97
were allowed in favour of the assessee and
consequently assessee is not before this Court
against the said orders passed against these two
appeals. These two appeals are confined against
Appeal Nos.7262 & 7263/MUM/96.
2. We find that Tribunal relied on his earlier
order dated 7.11.2003 for the A.Y.1990-91, in ITA
Nos.3057 to 3059/Mum/96. The assessee aggrieved,
: 2 :
preferred an appeal in this Court being Income Tax
Appeal No.395/2004 for the Assessment Year 1990-91.
By order dated 12.12.2005 the order of the Tribunal
was set aside and the matter remanded to the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal. For the same reason, we set
aside the order dated 14.9.2004 in both the appeals
and restore the appeals to the file of Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.