Case LawHigh Court › M/S.mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. The Cit C...

M/S.mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. The Cit City-Ii

High Court 03 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. The Cit City-Ii
Date of order
03 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
1991-92, 1990-91
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. The Cit City-Ii, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the same reason, we set aside the order dated 14.9.2004 in both the appeals and restore the appeals to the file of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
KJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.93 OF 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.94 OF 2005 M/s.Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., ..Appellant Versus The CIT City-II ..Respondent ---- Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the appellant. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 3rd March 2008. PC 1. These two appeals are in respect of A.Y.1991-92 and 1992-93 which were numbered as ITA Nos.7262/MUM/96 & 7263/MUM/96 and disposed off by a common order dated 14.9.2004 alongwith two other appeals being ITA Nos.7086 & 7087/MUM/97. We may make it clear that the ITA Nos.7086 & 7087/MUM/97 were allowed in favour of the assessee and consequently assessee is not before this Court against the said orders passed against these two appeals. These two appeals are confined against Appeal Nos.7262 & 7263/MUM/96. 2. We find that Tribunal relied on his earlier order dated 7.11.2003 for the A.Y.1990-91, in ITA Nos.3057 to 3059/Mum/96. The assessee aggrieved, : 2 : preferred an appeal in this Court being Income Tax Appeal No.395/2004 for the Assessment Year 1990-91. By order dated 12.12.2005 the order of the Tribunal was set aside and the matter remanded to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. For the same reason, we set aside the order dated 14.9.2004 in both the appeals and restore the appeals to the file of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan