M/S.marg Business Park Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax (Benami Prohibition), Initiating Officer, Room
High Court
18 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.marg Business Park Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax (Benami Prohibition), Initiating Officer, Room
Date of order
18 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.marg Business Park Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax (Benami Prohibition), Initiating Officer, Room, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.20142 of 2018
andW.M.P.No. 23614 of 2018
M/s.Marg Business Park Private Limited,Represented by its Authorized Signatory, Mr.K.S.Gajendra Babu,“Marg Axis”,No.4/318, Old Mahabalipuram Road,Kottivakkam,Chennai – 600 041.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Benami Prohibition), Initiating Officer, Room No.104, Income Tax Investigation Wing Building, 1[st] Floor, 108, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 034.
2.M/s.New Chennai Township Private Limited,
Represented by its Director, Mr.G.Ramakrishna Reddy, “Marg Axis”, No.4/318, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Kottivakkam, Chennai – 600 041.
...
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings dated 23.07.2018 of the 1st respondent in Order No.45/DCIT (BP)/2018-19 passed under Section 24(4) of The Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 and quash the same.
O R D E R
Mrs.M.Sheela, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the Income Tax Department brought to the notice of this Court that the provisional attachment made under the provision of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 was confirmed and final order after adjudication was passed on 26.08.2019. When final order has already been passed, no grievance exist for the petitioner-company.
2.Therefore, the petitioner-company is at liberty to workout their remedy in the manner contemplated under the statues and rules in force. As
Page 2 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
far as the cause in the present writ petition is concerned, it became vanished.
Therefore, no further adjudication is required.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
18.01.2024
vedaIndex : Yes / NoSpeaking order / Non-Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes / No
To
1.The Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Benami Prohibition), Initiating Officer, Room No.104, Income Tax Investigation Wing Building, 1[st] Floor, 108, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
Page 3 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 4 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.veda
W.P.No.20142 of 2018
18.01.2024(2/2)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.