Case LawHigh Court › Ms.masila v. The Commissioner Of Income...

Ms.masila v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals

High Court 16 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Ms.masila v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals
Date of order
16 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ms.masila v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-06-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 21036 of 2025AND WP NO. 21044 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23782 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23785 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23791 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23781 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23779 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23776 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23774 OF 2025,WP NO. 21041 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23778 OF 2025,WP NO. 21048 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23790 OF 2025,WP NO. 21038 OF 2025,WMP NO. 23787 OF 2025 W.P.Nos.21036, 21038, 21408, 21044 of 2025 Ms.Masila,No.91, Radha Avenue, Valasaravakkam Chennai 600 087.Presently at No.3/188, Mangalalakshmi Nagar, 1st Main Road, Madhanandhapuramm, Chennai – 600 125. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Income Tax Department, National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), New Delhi. 2.The Income Tax Officer,Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New DelhiWP No. 21041 of 2025Ms.Masila,No 91, Radha Avenue, Valasaravakkam Chennai 600 087. Presently at 3 of 188, Mangalalakshmi Nagar, 1st Main Road, Madhanandhapuram Chennai - 600125. Respondent(s) Petitioner(s)Vs1.The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals),Income Tax Department, National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), New Delhi. 2.The Income Tax Officer,O/o The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corp. Circle 8 (1),CHE Jayakar Bhawan Annexe Building,No. 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai. Respondent(s) PRAYER in WP No. 21036 of 2025:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 19.03.2025 bearing DIN and order NO. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1074697995(1) passed by the 1st respondent issued and quash the same. PRAYER in WP No. 21038 of 2025:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 19.03.2025 bearing DIN and order NO. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1074697237(1) passed by the 1st Respondent issued and quash the same. PRAYER in WP No. 21041 of 2025:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 19.03.2025 bearing DIN and order NO. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1074706202(1) passed by the 1st Respondent issued and quash the same. PRAYER in WP No. 21044 of 2025:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 19.03.2025 bearing DIN and order NO. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1074696663(1) passed by the 1st respondent issued and quash the same. WP Nos. 21036 of 2025 etc batch PRAYER in WP No. 21048 of 2025:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 19.03.2025 bearing DIN and order NO. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1074706979(1) passed by the 1st respondent issued and quash the same. In all W.Ps For Petitioner(s):Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan For Respondent(s):Ms.S.Premalatha Senior Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned impugned orders dated 19.03.2025, passed by the 1st respondent. 2.Ms.S.Premalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3.By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 4.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the mandatory requirement of personal hearing opportunity in terms of provision under Section In all W.Ps For Petitioner(s):Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan For Respondent(s):Ms.S.Premalatha Senior Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned impugned orders dated 19.03.2025, passed by the 1st respondent. 2.Ms.S.Premalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3.By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 4.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the mandatory requirement of personal hearing opportunity in terms of provision under Section 250(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has not been provided for the petitioner before disposing the appeal. Hence, he would submit that the impugned orders passed by the 1st respondent are violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of provision under Section 250(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and therefore, the present writ petition has been filed. 5.Ms.S.Premalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents by referring paragraph No.5 of the impugned orders dated 19.03.2025 would submit that in the present case, the 1st respondent issued notices to the petitioner on 19.10.2023, 27.10.2023, 29.11.2023, 12.12.2024, 13.01.2025 and 24.02.2025 by providing opportunity to the petitioner. Therefore, she would submit that ample opportunities were provided to the petitioner before disposing the appeal. 6.In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that those notices referred by the learned Senior Standing counsel was provided for filing written submissions and not for personal hearing. 7.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on records. 8.Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, it is evident that those notices mentioned in paragraph No.5 of the impugned orders dated 19.03.2025 were issued for the filing of written statement and not personal hearing notice as mandated under Section 250(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 9.For better appreciation Section 250(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is extracted hereunder:- “The [*** Commissioner (Appeals)] shall fix a day and place for the hearing of the appeal, and shall give notice of the same to the appellant and to the [Assessing Officer] against whose order the appeal is preferred.” 10.A perusal of the above provision shows that the notice has to be issued to the appellant by fixing the date and place of the hearing. 11.In the present case, no notice was issued communicating the personal hearing opportunity and without providing personal hearing opportunity, the impugned orders in appeal came to be passed, which is clear violation of principles of natural justices. Hence, this Court is inclined to set-aside the impugned orders dated 19.03.2025 with by issuing the following directions:- The orders impugned herein are set aside and the matters are remanded back to the 1st respondent for fresh consideration. strespondent is directed to issue a 14 days clear (ii) The 1strespondent is directed to issue a 14 days clear notice by fixing the date of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. 12.With the above directions, these writ petitions are disposed of. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. rst 16-06-2025 Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals),Income Tax Department, National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), New Delhi. 2.The Income Tax Officer,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,New Delhi. strespondent is directed to issue a 14 days clear (ii) The 1strespondent is directed to issue a 14 days clear notice by fixing the date of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. 12.With the above directions, these writ petitions are disposed of. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. rst 16-06-2025 Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals),Income Tax Department, National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), New Delhi. 2.The Income Tax Officer,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,New Delhi. 3.The Income Tax OfficerOo The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Non Corp Circle 8 1 CHE Jayakar Bhawan Annexe Building No 121 Mahatma Gandhi Road Nungambakkam Chennai KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.rst W.P.Nos.21036, 21038,21041, 21044 & 21048 of 2025 16-06-2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan