In M/S.mesuka Engineering Co. P. Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax-10(3)& Ors., Mumbai, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Since none is present, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1118 OF 2012
M/s.Mesuka Engineering Co. P. Ltd.
… Appellant
v/s
Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax-10(3)& ors., Mumbai.
… Respondent
None present for the appellant.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2014
P. C. :
1The appellant M/s.Mesuka Engineering Co. P. Ltd. and its advocate Mr.N.M.Porwal, both are absent. The appeal is pending in this Court for admission from the year 2011. It pertains to the assessment year 2007-2008. Since none is present, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue