M/S.metro Polymers Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
08 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.metro Polymers Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
08 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.metro Polymers Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 5.Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
ast
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1562 OF 2010
M/s.Metro Polymers Pvt.Ltd.
Vs.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax.
....Appellant
....Respondent.
Mr. N. Thakkar i/b. Mint and Confreres, advocate for appellant.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble, advocate for respondent.
CORAM:- J.P.DEVADHAR AND
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED:- FEBRUARY 8, 2011.
P.C.
1.Heard Counsel for the parties.
2.Admit on the following questions of law.
(a)Whether on the facts and in law the Tribunal erred in denying deduction under section 80IB of the Act with respect to income from DEPB incentives ?
(b)Whether profits eligible for deduction under section 80HHC of the Act can be reduced by the amount of deduction allowed under section 80-IB of the Act ?
2.By consent, the appeal is taken up for final hearing forthwith.
3.Counsel for the parties state that first question of law raised in this appeal is covered in favour of the Revenue by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Liberty India v/s. CIT reported in 317 ITR 218. Accordingly, this question is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
4.As regards second question is concerned, the Counsel on both sides state that the said question is answered against the revenue by the decision in the case of Associated Capsules Pvt.Ltd. v/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income tax in ITXA No.3036 of 2010 decided on 10[th] January, 2011. Accordingly, the second question is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
5.Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.