Ms.mili v. To 43, 46 To 49, 53 To 59, 61 N 71 Itxa-O

Priya Soparkar139 to 43, 46 to 49, 53 to 59, 61 n 71 itxa-o IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.363 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income-tax-6 … Appellant V/s. M/s Hermitage Investment & Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.407 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income-Tax-6… Appellant V/s. M/s Hindustan Chemical Works Ltd. … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.411 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-6… Appellant V/s.M/s Modern Terry Towels Limited… Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.116 OF 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax-7… Appellant V/s. M/s Precitex Rubber Components Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.822 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-6… Appellant V/s. M/s Metropolitan Eximchem Ltd. … Respondent Priya Soparkar239 to 43, 46 to 49, 53 to 59, 61 n 71 itxa-o WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1163 OF 2016 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-7 V/s.Means Infrastructure (India) P. Ltd. … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1222 OF 2016 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-7 V/s.M/s Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1275 OF 2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1365 OF 2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1714 OF 2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1770 OF 2016 Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax-7… Appellant V/s. Bhuvan Leasing & Infrastructure LLP … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1722 OF 2016 Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax-7 V/s. M/s Gravis Foods Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.140 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax-7… Appellant V/s. Priya Soparkar 339 to 43, 46 to 49, 53 to 59, 61 n 71 itxa-o Gala Precision Technology Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.303 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax-7 … Appellant V/s.Goldman Sachs Asset Management (I) Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.313 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax-7… Appellant V/s.M/s Greaves Cotton Ltd.… Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.581 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax-7… Appellant V/s.Lucid Colloids Ltd… Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.734 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax-7… Appellant V/s.M/s Nationwide Pharmassist Distribution P. Ltd.… Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.202 OF 2018 Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax-7… Appellant V/s.Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd.… Respondent --- Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellants. Ms.Mili V. Thakkar i/by S.V.Thakkar for the Respondent in ITXA Priya Soparkar No.407 of 2009. Ms.Vasanti Patel for the Respondent in ITXA No.411 of 2009.Mr.Rahul Hakani i/by Mr.Ajay R. Singh for the Respondent inITXA No.116 of 2010. Mr.Ashok Patil for the Respondent in ITXA No.822 of 2010.Mr.Jas Sanghavi i/by M/s PDS Legal for the Respondent in ITXANo.1722 of 2016. Mr.S.J.Mehta with Ms.A.Vissanji for the Respondent in ITXANo.313 of 2017. Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA No.581 of 2017. Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the Respondent in ITXA No.202 of 2018. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2018. P.C.:- 1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (the Tribunal). 2.Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenuestates that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less thanRs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018. 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. Priya Soparkar539 to 43, 46 to 49, 53 to 59, 61 n 71 itxa-o 4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the Respondent in ITXA No.202 of 2018. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2018. P.C.:- 1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (the Tribunal). 2.Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenuestates that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less thanRs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018. 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. Priya Soparkar539 to 43, 46 to 49, 53 to 59, 61 n 71 itxa-o 4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) ….