In M/S.mitchell Associates v. Income Tax Officer 16(1)(4), Mumbai & Another, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.618 OF 2012
M/s.Mitchell Associates
..Appellant.
Versus
Income Tax Officer 16(1)(4), Mumbai & Another..Respondents.
Mr.K. Gopal with Mr.Jitendra Singh for the appellant.Mr.A.R. Malhotra with Ms.Padma Divakar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ.
DATE : 19[th] March 2013
P.C. :
1.Counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the present appeal,
in view of the order dated 20[th] February 2013 passed by the Tribunal in a miscellaneous application filed by the appellant before the Tribunal.
2.The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Refund of court fee in accordance with the Rules.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue