Case LawHigh Court › M/S.modi Bharatkumar Bhogilal & Co v. As...

M/S.modi Bharatkumar Bhogilal & Co v. Asstt.commissioner Of Income Tax (Inv

High Court 02 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.modi Bharatkumar Bhogilal & Co v. Asstt.commissioner Of Income Tax (Inv
Date of order
02 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.modi Bharatkumar Bhogilal & Co v. Asstt.commissioner Of Income Tax (Inv, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances ofthe case and in law, the Tribunal failed toappreciate that their action of confirming theaddition was contrary to the ratio laid downby the Supreme Court in the case of C.I.T Vs.Orissa Corporation (1986) 159 ITR 78?

Decision: 2.After hearing the parties for some time, by consent of both the learned Counsel for the Appellantand Respondent, it is categorically agreed, that theAppellant will appear before the Assessing Officer and thereof, the Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1064 OF 2000 M/s.Modi Bharatkumar Bhogilal & Co. ..Appellant Vs. Asstt.Commissioner of Income Tax (Inv) ..Respondent Ms.Aasifa Khan i/b.S.M.Lala for the Appellant.Mr.D.K.Kamwal for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. 1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The above Appeal was admitted on 21st January,2002 on the following substantial questions of law. 1. Whether on the facts and circumstances ofthe case and in law, the Tribunal failed toappreciate the confirmation letters bearingname, address and income tax numbers of eachof the lenders having submitted, thepreliminary onus under Section 68 of theIncome Tax Act was discharged by theAppellants and it was the Respondent who wassupposed adduce material in support of hisclaim that the loans were not genuine?3. Whether on the facts and circumstances ofthe case and in law, the Tribunal failed toappreciate that their action of confirming theaddition was contrary to the ratio laid downby the Supreme Court in the case of C.I.T Vs.Orissa Corporation (1986) 159 ITR 78? 2.After hearing the parties for some time, by consent of both the learned Counsel for the Appellantand Respondent, it is categorically agreed, that theAppellant will appear before the Assessing Officer and thereof, the Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the above. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan