Case LawHigh Court › Ms.monika Sehgal v. Deputy Commissioner...

Ms.monika Sehgal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 08 Mar 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ms.monika Sehgal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
08 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ms.monika Sehgal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: These appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~56 & 57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 221/2019 & CM Nos.10951-53/2019 MS.MONIKA SEHGAL ..... Appellant versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.. Respondent + ITA 222/2019 & CM Nos.10957-59/2019 MS.MONIKA SEHGAL ..... Appellant versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.. Respondent Present : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Somil Agarwal, Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta and Ms. Monika Ghai, Advs. for appellant. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R% 08.03.2019 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the rectification application is pending. In these circumstances, this court is of the opinion that the said remedy should be exhausted before the assessee approaches this court. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks liberty to withdraw these appeals and approach this court at a later date again, if required, with the same grievance or any further grievance with respect to the rectification order. Liberty granted. These appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications also stand dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MARCH 08, 2019/aj PRATEEK JALAN, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan