Ms.monika Sehgal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
08 Mar 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ms.monika Sehgal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
08 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ms.monika Sehgal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: These appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~56 & 57
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 221/2019 & CM Nos.10951-53/2019
MS.MONIKA SEHGAL ..... Appellant
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.. Respondent
+ ITA 222/2019 & CM Nos.10957-59/2019
MS.MONIKA SEHGAL ..... Appellant
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.. Respondent
Present : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Somil Agarwal, Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta and Ms. Monika Ghai, Advs. for appellant.
Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R% 08.03.2019
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the rectification application is pending. In these circumstances, this court is of the opinion that the said remedy should be exhausted before the assessee approaches this court. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks liberty to withdraw these appeals and approach this court at a later date again, if required, with the same grievance or any further grievance with respect to the rectification order. Liberty granted.
These appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications also stand dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
MARCH 08, 2019/aj
PRATEEK JALAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.