Case LawHigh Court › M/S.new Woodlands Hotel Pvt.ltd.,71 v. T...

M/S.new Woodlands Hotel Pvt.ltd.,71 v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcompany Circle-4(2),Chennai

High Court 16 Mar 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.new Woodlands Hotel Pvt.ltd.,71 v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcompany Circle-4(2),Chennai
Date of order
16 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.new Woodlands Hotel Pvt.ltd.,71 v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcompany Circle-4(2),Chennai, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: No costs.Case Appeals are dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s.New Woodlands Hotel Pvt.Ltd.,71-75, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road,Mylapore,Chennai-600 034...Appellant in both appeals Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCompany Circle-4(2),Chennai. ..Respondent in both appeals COMMON PRAYER:-Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260-A ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, ''B'' Bench, Chennai, dated 30.01.2019 inI.T.A.No.2508/CHNY/2017 and I.T.A.No.2509/CHNY/2017 against thecommon order of Income Tax(A) - 8, Chennai dated 26/07/2017 forthe Assessment year 2013-2014 and 2014-2015, respectively,against the order dated 15/03/2016 of the AssisstentCommissioner of Income Tax Corporate Circle 4(2), Chennai. For Appellant in both appeals :Mr.G.BaskarFor Respondent in both appeals :Mr.Karthick Ranganathan COMMON JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.,] It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for theappellant / assessee that in the light of the common order dated11.12.2019 in M.P.Nos.147 and 148/Chny/2019 pertains to theassessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, ''B'' Bench, Chennai, nothing remains forfurther adjudication in these Tax Case Appeals. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Heard the submission of Mr.Karthick Ranganathan, learnedStanding Counsel for respondent / Revenue also. 3. In the light of the said development, nothing remains forfurther adjudication in these appeals. In the result, these TaxCase Appeals are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.Case Appeals are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sk To 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle-4(2), Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax(A)-8, Chennai. 3. The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, 'B' Bench, Chennai 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle IV(2), Chennai. T.C.A.Nos.468 & 469 of 2018 PPA(CO)KKV/09/07/2020
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan