Case LawHigh Court › M/S.peninsula Land Limited, Mumbai v. In...

M/S.peninsula Land Limited, Mumbai v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(1)(3), Mumbai

High Court 22 Oct 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.peninsula Land Limited, Mumbai v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(1)(3), Mumbai
Date of order
22 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S.peninsula Land Limited, Mumbai v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(1)(3), Mumbai, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2229 OF 2012 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1319 OF 2012 M/s.Peninsula Land Limited, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(1)(3), Mumbai..Respondent. Mr.Atul K Jasani for the appellant.Ms.S.V. Bharucha for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 22[nd] October 2012 P.C. : 1.By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). (M.S. Sanklecha, J.)(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan