In M/S.prakash Kothari & Co v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-19 (2) Mumbai, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.680 OF 2003
M/s.Prakash Kothari & Co.
vs.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle-19 (2) Mumbai
Appellant
Respondent
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the appellant.
Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/b.Mr.P. Kapur for the respondent.
P.C.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 4th November 2004
order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30th
July 2004 in rectification application.
2. In view thereof, the learned counsel for the
appellant prays for withdrawal of this appeal.
3. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
4. Refund of court fee as per law.
(R.M.LODHA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue