Case Law › High Court › M/S.ramani Exports, Mumbai v. Commission...

M/S.ramani Exports, Mumbai v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Xvi, Mumbai

High Court 20 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Sep 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In M/S.ramani Exports, Mumbai v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Xvi, Mumbai, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2004 M/s.Ramani Exports, Mumbai vs. Commissioner of Income-tax,XVI,Mumbai. Petitioner Respondents Mrs.A. Vissanjee with Mr.S.J. Mehta for thepetitioner. Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Mr.R.Asokan for therespondents. CORAM: R. M. LODHA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 20th September 2004 P.C. Rule. 2. Returnable forthwith. 3. The advocate on record for the revenue waives service. 4. By consent, rule is treated on board for hearing. the petitioner had no control. By overlooking this vital aspect the impugned order is vitiated. 80HHC(2)(a) after giving an opportunity of being heardto the petitioner. 7. No costs. (R.M. LODHA, J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.