In M/S.rasiklal Kantialal & Co v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-15, Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty as prayed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2299 OF 2016
M/s.Rasiklal Kantialal & Co.
Versus
The Commissioner of Income-tax-15, Mumbai & Anr.
...Petitioner
..Respondents
Mr.K.H. Halai with Mr.P. Ranjan I/b. Halai & Co. for Petitioner.Mr.A.R. Malhotra for Respondent No.1.
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & S.C. GUPTE, JJ.
DATE : 1 OCTOBER 2016
P.C.:
Mr.Halai, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks to
withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition as an assessmentorder relating to Assessment Year 2011-12 has been passed consequent tothe reopening notice dated 15 March 2013.
In the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty as prayed. No order as to costs.
(S.C. GUPTE, J.)
(M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue