Case LawHigh Court › M/S.sahney Kirkwood Pvt.ltd v. Heard The...

M/S.sahney Kirkwood Pvt.ltd v. Heard The Learned Counsel For The Parties

High Court 16 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.sahney Kirkwood Pvt.ltd v. Heard The Learned Counsel For The Parties
Date of order
16 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.sahney Kirkwood Pvt.ltd v. Heard The Learned Counsel For The Parties, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.367 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1496 OF 2007 WITHIN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.368 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1515 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.369 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1517 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.370 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1516 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.371 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1509 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.372 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1501 OF 2007 M/s.Sahney Kirkwood Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant Vs. The Additional Commissioner of IncomeTax, Range-10(2)Mr.S.E.Dastur, Senior Advocate with Mr.R.Murlidharwith Mr.Rajesh Shah for the Appellant.Mr.Parag Vyas a/w. Ms.Anamika Malhotra for theRespondent. ..Respondent CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 16TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. .Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. aforesaid Application is decided and for a further period of two weeks thereafter. 3.Since the hearing of the above Appeals has already been expedited, the above Appeals be placed on board for hearing on 29th November,2008. 4.All the above Notices of Motion stand disposed of accordingly. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan