M/S.saipem India Projects Limitedyarlagadda Towers v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle-Vi(I),Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034
High Court
15 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.saipem India Projects Limitedyarlagadda Towers v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle-Vi(I),Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034
Date of order
15 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.saipem India Projects Limitedyarlagadda Towers v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle-Vi(I),Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: For appellant : Mr.Sandeep Bagmar.R.,For respondent: Mr.J.Narayanasamy, Standing Counsel COMMON JUDGMENT In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant on the grounds of appeal to the effect that the appellant had availed Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) Scheme and hence, prayed for...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
T.C.A.Nos.815 and 816 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 15.12.2022
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHANandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.Nos.815 and 816 of 2017
---
M/s.Saipem India Projects LimitedYarlagadda Towers, 4, Fourth Lane,Off Nungambakkam High Road,Chennai-600 034PAN: AAAC17915F.
.. Appellant in both the appeals
Vs.
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Corporate Circle-VI(I),Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
.. Respondent in both the appeals
Tax Case Appeal No.815 of 2017 filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai-'D" Bench, dated 05.04.2017 in I.T.A.No.985/Mds/2014.
Tax Case Appeal No.816 of 2017 filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Page No.1 / 4
Appellate Tribunal, Chennai-'D" Bench, dated 05.04.2017 in I.T.A.No.1400/Mds/2014.
For appellant : Mr.Sandeep Bagmar.R.,For respondent: Mr.J.Narayanasamy, Standing Counsel
COMMON JUDGMENT
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant on the grounds of appeal to the effect that the appellant had availed Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) Scheme and hence, prayed for withdrawal of the present Tax Case Appeals, with liberty that in the event the appellant's Scheme not accepted, they may revive these appeals, the present Tax Case Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with the said liberty. There shall be no order as to costs.
cs
(S.V.N., J) (M.S.Q., J)15.12.2022
ToPage No.2 / 4
T.C.A.Nos.815 and 816 of 2017
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-VI(I), Nungambakkam,
Chennai-600 034.
2. The Presiding Officer,
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai-'D" Bench
A-3, II Floor, Rajaji Bhavan,
Besant Nagar,
Chennai-600 090.
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J
Page No.3 / 4
Page No.4 / 4
T.C.A.Nos.815 and 816 of 2017
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J
cs
T.C.A.Nos.815 and 816 of 2017
15.12.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue