In M/S.salasar Developers v. The Asstt.commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
M/s.Salasar Developers....Appellant
vs.
The Asstt.Commissioner of Income Tax ...Respondent.
---
Mr.A.K.Singh, for appellant.
P.C.:-1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for boththe appellant. Perused the record. The finding thatthe subsequent agreement of the year 2000 was not agenuine agreement, is essentially a finding of fact.No question of law arises. Hence, the appeal isrejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
2
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue