Case LawHigh Court › M/S.sapthagiri Cargo v. Assessment Unit,...

M/S.sapthagiri Cargo v. Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,New Delhi

High Court 13 Jun 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.sapthagiri Cargo v. Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,New Delhi
Date of order
13 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.sapthagiri Cargo v. Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,New Delhi, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms without any order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.14740 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.06.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Writ Petition No.14740 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.15982 & 15985 of 2024 M/s.Sapthagiri Cargo, Represented by its Managing Partner & CEO,B3-Olympia Grande,Pallavaram, Chennai-600 043. .. Petitioner -vs- Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,New Delhi. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the files of the respondent order dated 19.03.2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA / AST / S / 143(3) / 2023-24 / 1062907062(1), Demand Notice dated 19.03.2024 bearing DIN and Notice No. ITBA / AST / S / 156 / 2023-24 / 1062907362(1) and the penalty proceedings dated 19.03.2024 and the penalty proceedings dated 19.03.2024 bearing DIN ITBA / PNL / S / 270A / 1/5 W.P.No.14740 of 2024 2023-24 / 1062907210(1) and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent not to initiate any recovery or any other coercive action against the petitioner. For Petitioner : Ms.A.V.Bharathi For Respondent : Mr.V.Mahalingam, Senior Standing CounselMr.S.Rajasekar, Junior Standing Counsel ORDER An assessment order dated 19.03.2024 and the consequential penalty proceedings are assailed in this writ petition on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner requested for a personal hearing by video-conference. She further submits that a hearing by video-conference was offered and that the petitioner joined the meeting, but there was no participation from the Income Tax Department. In these circumstances, she submits that the impugned assessment order records that the petitioner did not attend the video-conference hearing. 3. Mr.V.Mahalingam, learned senior standing counsel, accepts notice 2/5 W.P.No.14740 of 2024 for the respondent. He points out that the petitioner filed a statutory appeal against the assessment order. Therefore, he submits that the present writ petition is not maintainable. 4. Under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a personal hearing through video-conference is mandatory when requested for by the assessee. In this case, without doubt, a request for personal hearing was made and the petitioner endeavoured to participate in such personal hearing by logging-in. The documents on record disclose that such hearing was not effective because of the non participation of the respondent. In these circumstances, the impugned assessment order and the consequential penalty order cannot be sustained. However, the petitioner shall withdraw the statutory appeal filed in this regard within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to this condition, the petitioner is entitled to relief. 5. For reasons aforesaid, the impugned assessment order dated 3/5 W.P.No.14740 of 2024 19.03.2024 and impugned penalty proceedings of the same date are set aside and the matter is remanded for reconsideration. The respondent is directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including an effective personal hearing through video-conference, before issuing fresh orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 13.06.2024Index : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoNeutral Citation: Yes / No kj SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J 4/5 To Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,New Delhi. 5/5 W.P.No.14740 of 2024 kj Writ Petition No.14740 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.15982 & 15985 of 2024 13.06.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan