M/S.skylark Traders Pvt.ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 1(5), Bombay
High Court
11 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.skylark Traders Pvt.ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 1(5), Bombay
Date of order
11 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
1987-88
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S.skylark Traders Pvt.ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 1(5), Bombay, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2003
M/s.Skylark Traders Pvt.Ltd.
vs.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax,Circle 1(5), Bombay
Appellant
Respondent
Mr.Sunil Lala for the appellant.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mr.V.H.Kantharia i/b. Mr.P.Kapurfor the respondent.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 11th October 2004
P.C.
Union of India & Anr. v. British India Corporation
Ltd. & ors., 268 ITR 481.
2. The order of the assessment is dated 19th March 1990for the assessment year 1987-88. The learned counsel
assessment year 1987-88 was in fact not made on 19th
March 1990.
3. No substantial question of law arises in the appeal.
4. Dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue