M/S.sulphur Mills Limited, Mumbai v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(4), Mumbai & Others
High Court
22 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.sulphur Mills Limited, Mumbai v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(4), Mumbai & Others
Date of order
22 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S.sulphur Mills Limited, Mumbai v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(4), Mumbai & Others, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.53 OF 2011
M/s.Sulphur Mills Limited, MumbaiVersus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(4), Mumbai & Others
..Appellant.
..Respondents.
Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.None for the respondents.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ. DATE : 22[nd] March, 2011.
1.This appeal is filed by the appellant against the order of the Income TAx Appellate Tribunal dated 23-07-2010 in Income Tax Appeal No.2062/Mum/07 relating to the assessment year 2003-04. Perusal of the order of the Tribunal shows that the Tribunal has restored the matter to the file of the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) for a fresh adjudication in the light of the Special Bench decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ACIT V/s. Hindustan Mint & Agro Products Pvt. Limited reported in 119 ITD 107 (SB).
2.Since the matter is remanded back to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), we are not inclined to entertain this
appeal. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) while giving effect to the order of the Tribunal shall take into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Associated Capsules Private Limited V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 197 Taxman 84 (Bom).
3.The appeal is accordingly disposed off. No costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.