M/S.tachyon Technologies (P) Ltd v. State Of Tamil Nadu,Rep. By The Joint Commissioner (Ct
High Court
13 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.tachyon Technologies (P) Ltd v. State Of Tamil Nadu,Rep. By The Joint Commissioner (Ct
Date of order
13 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.tachyon Technologies (P) Ltd v. State Of Tamil Nadu,Rep. By The Joint Commissioner (Ct, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 8.7.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIAND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY T.C.Nos.40 to 42 of 2013
M/s.Tachyon Technologies (P) Ltd.,36, Balakrishna Street,Valmiki Nagar, Chennai 600 041. Appellant
vs State of Tamil Nadu,Rep. by the Joint Commissioner (CT)
Chennai (South ) Division, Greams Road, Chennai.Respondent
Tax Cases filed under Section 38 of the TNGST Act, 1959 seeking to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench), Chennai in T.A.Nos.200, 201 and 150 of 2010 dated 17.9.2012.
For Appellant: Mr. K.VaitheesaranFor Respondent: Mr.M.Hariharan, AGPCOMMON ORDER
(Made by Dr.Vineet Kothari,J)
The Court was held by Video Conference, as per the Resolution
1/3
of the Full Court dated 3 July 2020, by Judges at the respective residences and the counsel, staff of the Court appearing from their respective residences.
2. At the request of the learned counsel for the Appellant, list
after four weeks. The learned counsel for the Respondent has no objection for the same.
3. The soft copies of the typed set may be sent by the learned counsels to the Registry alongwith hard copy, if any and the same could be placedbefore the court on the next hearing date.
Put up after four weeks.
ssk.
(V.K.J.) (K.R.,J.) 8.7.2020
Dr.VINEET KOTHARI, J.and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.ssk.
T.C.Nos.40 to 42 of 2013
2/3
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.