M/S.tanna & Co v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 25(3)(4
High Court
03 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.tanna & Co v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 25(3)(4
Date of order
03 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.tanna & Co v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 25(3)(4, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.335 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.335 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.335 OF 2005
M/s.Tanna & Co. .. Appellant
Vs.
Income Tax Officer, Ward 25(3)(4)
Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.Jitendra Singh i/by M/s.K.Gopal for the Appellant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd June, 2008
DATE : 3rd June, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be
withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue