Case LawHigh Court › M/S.the Art Palace v. Dy.commissioner Of...

M/S.the Art Palace v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Sikar,Distt.sikar

High Court 04 May 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
M/S.the Art Palace v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Sikar,Distt.sikar
Date of order
04 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S.the Art Palace v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Sikar,Distt.sikar, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. anil (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ) J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1249/2009. M/s.The Art Palace Vs. Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle Sikar,Distt.Sikar. Date of Order:- May 4, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Sushil Singh for Shri Ankur Rastogi for the petitioner. ****** BY THE COURT:- The petitioner has filed this writ petitionagainst the show cause notice issued to him under Section148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year2003-04. I do not find any reason to entertain the writpetition which is directed against the show cause notice.If and when any order is passed by the assessingauthority, he would have remedy under the Income-tax Act,1961 itself against such order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. anil (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ) J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan