Case LawHigh Court › M/S.the Thiruvanmiyur Milk Consumer's Co...

M/S.the Thiruvanmiyur Milk Consumer's Co-Operative Society Limited v. The Assessing Officer,Income Tax Department, Corporate Ward 3(1) Che,Room

High Court 05 Feb 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.the Thiruvanmiyur Milk Consumer's Co-Operative Society Limited v. The Assessing Officer,Income Tax Department, Corporate Ward 3(1) Che,Room
Date of order
05 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.the Thiruvanmiyur Milk Consumer's Co-Operative Society Limited v. The Assessing Officer,Income Tax Department, Corporate Ward 3(1) Che,Room, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For reasons set out above, the assessment orders and consequential penalty orders impugned in these writ petitions are quashed and the matter is remanded for reconsideration by the assessing officer.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.Nos.30306, 30308, 30309 & 30329 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.02.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Writ Petition Nos.30306, 30308, 30309 & 30329 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.29750, 29751, 29752, 29754, 29755, 29757, 29770, 29771, 32728, 32729, 32731, 32732, 32817, 32819, 32872 & 32874 of 2022 In all WPs. M/s.The Thiruvanmiyur Milk Consumer's Co-operative Society Limited,Represented by its Secretary,Mr.C.Sakthivel, No.6/19,Kottiwalkam Kuppam Road,Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600 041. ... Petitioner -vs- The Assessing Officer,Income Tax Department, Corporate Ward 3(1) CHE,Room No.415, 4[th] floor,Chennai Wanaparathy Block,No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. ... Respondent Prayer in W.P.No.30306 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the respondent DIN and Order 1/6 W.P.Nos.30306, 30308, 30309 & 30329 of 2022 No.ITBA/PNL/S/992/2022-2023/1045889526(1) dated 26.09.2022 and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.30308 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the respondent DIN and Order No.ITBA/PNL/S/992/2022-2023/1045889841(1) dated 26.09.2022 and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.30309 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the respondent DIN and Order No.ITBA/PNL/S/992/2022-2023/1045889645(1) dated 26.09.2022 and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.30329 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the respondent DIN and Order No.ITBA/PNL/S/992/2022-2023/1045961922(1) dated 26.09.2022 and quash the same. In all WPs. For Petitioner : Mr.M.K.Bhoopathy Rajan For Respondent : Mr.R.S.Balaji, Senior Standing Counsel Mrs.S.Premalatha, Junior Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER 2/6 W.P.Nos.30306, 30308, 30309 & 30329 of 2022 In all these four writ petitions, the respective assessment order and the consequential penalty orders are challenged on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. The petitioner asserts that it is a Co-operative Society; that PAN was issued erroneously and that, therefore, the petitioner was classified as a company in the records of the Income Tax Department. By further asserting that the petitioner was unable to file its returns from assessment year 2013-2014 to assessment year 2018-2019 and avail exemption because of the above error, the respective assessment orders are assailed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that rectified PAN was obtained by surrendering the old PAN and that, therefore, the petitioner is now in a position to file returns for assessment years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018 electronically. 4. Mr.R.S.Balaji, learned senior standing counsel for the respondent, 3/6 W.P.Nos.30306, 30308, 30309 & 30329 of 2022 also confirms that the petitioner has obtained the new PAN and should be directed to file returns electronically using the new PAN. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that rectified PAN was obtained by surrendering the old PAN and that, therefore, the petitioner is now in a position to file returns for assessment years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018 electronically. 4. Mr.R.S.Balaji, learned senior standing counsel for the respondent, 3/6 W.P.Nos.30306, 30308, 30309 & 30329 of 2022 also confirms that the petitioner has obtained the new PAN and should be directed to file returns electronically using the new PAN. 5. On perusing the impugned assessment orders, it is evident that such orders were issued because of non compliance by the petitioner in filing the returns of income pertaining to the Co-operative Society. From the averments in the affidavit and the submissions of learned counsel, it is evident that such returns could not be filed in view of the issuance of a PAN for a limited company to the petitioner instead of issuing the PAN for a Co-operative Society. Subsequently, this anomaly was rectified by issuing PAN to the petitioner. As a corollary, the petitioner is now in a position to file returns electronically for assessment years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018. In order to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to file such returns, the impugned orders are liable to be interfered with. 6. For reasons set out above, the assessment orders and consequential penalty orders impugned in these writ petitions are quashed and the matter is remanded for reconsideration by the assessing officer. The petitioner is 4/6 W.P.Nos.30306, 30308, 30309 & 30329 of 2022 directed to file returns of income pertaining to assessment years 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt thereof, the assessing officer is directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including personal hearing, and issue fresh assessment orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of returns of income from the petitioner. 7. The writ petitions are allowed on the above terms. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 05.02.2024Index : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoNeutral Citation: Yes / No kj SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J 5/6 W.P.Nos.30306, 30308, 30309 & 30329 of 2022 kj To The Assessing Officer,Income Tax Department, Corporate Ward 3(1) CHE,Room No.415, 4[th] floor,Chennai Wanaparathy Block,No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. Writ Petition Nos.30306, 30308, 30309 & 30329 of 2022and W.M.P.Nos.29750, 29751, 29752, 29754, 29755, 29757, 29770, 29771, 32728, 32729, 32731, 32732, 32817, 32819, 32872 & 32874 of 2022 05.02.2024 6/6
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan