Case LawHigh Court › M/S.the Vikas Academy, Rep. By Its Manag...

M/S.the Vikas Academy, Rep. By Its Managing v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle – 3, Madurai – 2

High Court 25 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
M/S.the Vikas Academy, Rep. By Its Managing v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle – 3, Madurai – 2
Date of order
25 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.the Vikas Academy, Rep. By Its Managing v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle – 3, Madurai – 2, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 25.02.2021 M/s.The Vikas Academy,Rep. by its Managing Partner,Biju Nayar Sudarsan,Vikasa School Compound,Aarappalayam Cross Road,Ponnagaram,Madurai – 625 016. ... PetitionerVs. 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle – 3, Madurai – 2. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) – 1, Madurai. ... Respondents Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petitionis filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus,calling for the records on the file of the first respondent in PANNo.AADFT2762M and quash the impugned order dated 16.02.2016 passedby the first respondent rejecting the stay petition for the A.Y.2009-10 and direct the first respondent to grant stay of demandpending disposal of the appeal before the second respondent. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andthe learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner suffered an adverse order at the hands ofthe first respondent. Questioning the same, the petitioner filedI.T.A.No.149/2015-16 before the second respondent. The petitionerasked for interim relief and the same was declined. Questioning thesame, this writ petition came to be filed. 3. During the pendency of the writ petition, I.T.A.No.149/2015-16 itself was allowed on 18.10.2019. Since the mainproceedings itself ended in favour of the petitioner, nothingsurvives for further consideration. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 W.P.(MD)NO.4351 OF 2016 4. Recording the said subsequent development, this writpetition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connectedmiscellaneous petition is closed. // True Copy // Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) / /2021Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) PMU Note: In view of the present lock down owing toCOVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may beutilized for official purposes, but, ensuring thatthe copy of the order that is presented is thecorrect copy, shall be the responsibility of theadvocate/litigant concerned. To: 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle – 3, Madurai – 2. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) – 1, Madurai. Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.S.SRIMATHY, Advocate ( SR-7563[F] dated 26/02/2021 ) W.P.(MD)No.4351 of 201625.02.2021
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan