Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί M/S.ttk Healthcare Ltd v. The Assistant...

M/S.ttk Healthcare Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle – Iii (2),Chennai

High Court 18 Mar 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.ttk Healthcare Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle – Iii (2),Chennai
Date of order
18 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S.ttk Healthcare Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle – Iii (2),Chennai, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

T.C.A.No.359 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.03.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN T.C.A.No.359 of 2012 M/s.TTK Healthcare Ltd.,6, Cathedral Road,Chennai – 600 086. ... Appellant Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle – III (2),Chennai. .. Respondent Prayer : Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal β€œC” Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.833/Mds/10, dated 13.10.2011 for AY 2006-07. For Appellant:Mr.J.NarayanasamySenior Standing Counsel For Respondent:Mr.R.Venkata Narayananfor M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan Page 1 J U D G M E N T(Judgment was delivered by S.S. SUNDAR, J.) Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has been given the benefit of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form-II has also been issued and no amount is payable. It is in the said circumstances, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal. 2.Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. mkn (S.S.S.R., J.) (C.S.N., J.) 18.03.2025 Internet : YesIndex : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes / No To Page 2 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, β€œC” Bench, Chennai. β€œC” Bench, Chennai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle – III (2), Chennai. Company Circle – III (2), Chennai. S.S. SUNDAR, J.and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 T.C.A.No.359 of 2012 C. SARAVANAN, J. mkn T.C.A.No.359 of 2012 18.03.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan