In M/S.uttam Steel Ltd v. Core Health Care Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In view thereof we dismiss the above Appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.859 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.
..Appellant
M/s.Uttam Steel Ltd.
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.K.Shivram with Mr.Paras Savla for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.
.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.Both the learned Counsel for the parties categoricallystate that the question of law raised in the aboveAppeal is squarely covered in favour of the Assesseeand against the Revenue by the recent judgment of theHon’ble Supreme Court in the case of DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Core Health Care Ltd.
(2008) 298 ITR 194 (SC). In view thereof we dismiss
the above Appeal.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue