Case LawHigh Court › M/S.v.arjoon v. The<Br>Learned<Br>Counse...

M/S.v.arjoon v. The<Br>Learned<Br>Counselfor<Br>Theappellant<Br>Seeks<Br>Leave

High Court 24 Nov 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.v.arjoon v. The<Br>Learned<Br>Counselfor<Br>Theappellant<Br>Seeks<Br>Leave
Date of order
24 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S.v.arjoon v. The<Br>Learned<Br>Counselfor<Br>Theappellant<Br>Seeks<Br>Leave, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.175 OF 2006 M/s.V.ArjoonVs.Commissioner of Income TaxMr.K.Sivaram i/b.A.R.Singh for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. ..Appellant ..Respondent CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2008 P.C. be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court Fees be refunded to the Appellant, as per rules. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan