Case LawHigh Court › M/S.vinbros & Co., Rep. By Its Managing...

M/S.vinbros & Co., Rep. By Its Managing v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward I (1), Pondicherry

High Court 23 Oct 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S.vinbros & Co., Rep. By Its Managing v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward I (1), Pondicherry
Date of order
23 Oct 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S.vinbros & Co., Rep. By Its Managing v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward I (1), Pondicherry, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.Nos.35908 to 35910 of 2007 M/s.Vinbros & Co., rep.by its Managing Partner V.C.Raamsukaesh...Petitioner in all W.PsVs 1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward I (1), Pondicherry. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) XI, No.121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai-34. ...Respondents in all W.Ps Common Prayer: PETITIONS under Article 226 of The Constitution of Indiapraying for the issuance a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the firstrespondent from demanding the payment or taking proceedings forrecovery of the demand pursuant to the order of assessment inP.A.No./G.I.No.AAAFV0610R/ 4301/V respectively dated 22.8.2007,30.8.2007 and 30.8.2007 relating to the assessment years 2005-06, 2000-01 and 2002-03 pending disposal of the appeals filedbefore the second respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writpetitions have become infructuous and that the same may bedismissed as such. She has also made an endorsement in thebundle today to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Hence, the writ petitions are dismissed as having becomeinfructuous. No costs. -s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward I (1), Pondicherry.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) XI, No.121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai-34. +1 Cc to Mallika Srinivasan, Advocate sr 74463.+1 CC to Mr.A.P. Srinivas, Advocate sr 74944.NMI(CO)SP(13/11/2017) WP.Nos.35908 to 35910 of 2007
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan