M/S.v.v.titanium Pigments Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
27 Sep 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
M/S.v.v.titanium Pigments Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.v.v.titanium Pigments Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, permission is granted and accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.(MD).No.13250 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
W.P.(MD).No.13250 of 2021
M/s.V.V.Titanium Pigments Private Limited,Represented by its Director,V.Subramanian
vs
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Central Circle 2, Madurai, Income Tax Staff Quarters Complex, Kulamangalam Main Road, Meenambalpuram, Madurai – 625 002.
... Petitioner
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal-19),
O/o. Income Tax Department,
New No.46, Old No.108,
M.G.Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
... Respondents
PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of Writ of Mandamus,
I. Forbearing the first respondent from initiating any coercive action till the
disposal of the stay application filed in appeal in ITA No. 09/2021-22, on the file
of the second respondent.
II. Directing the second respondent herein to dispose of the appeal in ITA No.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD).No.13250 of 2021
09/2021-22, filed by the Petitioner Concern on 06.04.2021 against the order passed by the first respondent dated 18.02.2021 for the Assessment Year 2014-15. III. Forbearing the first respondent from initiating any coercive action till the disposal of the stay application filed in appeal in ITA No.10/2021-22 on the file of the second respondent.
IV. Directing the 2nd respondent herein to dispose of the appeal in ITA No.10/2021-22, filed by the Petitioner Concern on 06.04.2021 against the order passed by the first respondent dated 18.02.2021 for the Assessment Year 2015-16.
V. Forbearing the first respondent from initiating any coercive action till the disposal of the stay application filed in appeal in ITA No.11/2021-22, on the file of the second respondent.
VI. Directing the second respondent herein to dispose of the appeal in ITA No.11/2021-22, filed by the Petitioner Concern on 06.04.2021 against the order passed by the first respondent dated 04.03.2021 for the Assessment Year 2016-17.
VII. Forbearing the first respondent from initiating any coercive action till the disposal of the stay application filed in appeal in ITA No.12/2021-22 on the file of the second respondent.
VIII. Directing the second respondent herein to dispose of the appeal in I.T.A.No.12/2021-22, filed by the Petitioner Concern on 06.04.2021 against the order passed by the first respondent dated 04.03.2021 for the Assessment Year 2017-18.
IX. Forbearing the first respondent from initiating any coercive action till the disposal of the stay application filed in appeal in ITA No.13/2021-22 on the file https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judisof the second respondent.
W.P.(MD).No.13250 of 2021
X. Directing the second respondent herein to dispose of the appeal in ITA No.13/2021-22 filed by the Petitioner Concern on 06.04.2021 against the order passed by the first respondent dated 04.03.2021 for the Assessment Year 2018-19.
XI. Forbearing the first respondent from initiating any coercive action till the disposal of the stay application filed in appeal in ITA No.14/2021-22 on the file of the second respondent.
XII. Directing the second respondent herein to dispose of the appeal in ITA No.14/2021-22 filed by the Petitioner Concern on 06.04.2021 against the order passed by the first respondent dated 11.03.2021 for the Assessment Year 2019-20.
For Petitioner: Mr.M.Maharaja
For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar,
Standing Counsel.
*****
O R D E R
The writ petitioner has instructed his counsel to withdraw the Writ
Petition. Accordingly, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has circulated a letter in this connection. He also made an endorsement to that effect.
W.P.(MD).No.13250 of 2021
2. Hence, permission is granted and accordingly, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
NCC: Yes / NoIndex : Yes / No
Internet : Yes
27.09.2023
Nsr
To
For Petitioner: Mr.M.Maharaja
For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar,
Standing Counsel.
*****
O R D E R
The writ petitioner has instructed his counsel to withdraw the Writ
Petition. Accordingly, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has circulated a letter in this connection. He also made an endorsement to that effect.
W.P.(MD).No.13250 of 2021
2. Hence, permission is granted and accordingly, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
NCC: Yes / NoIndex : Yes / No
Internet : Yes
27.09.2023
Nsr
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Central Circle 2, Madurai, Income Tax Staff Quarters Complex, Kulamangalam Main Road, Meenambalpuram,
Madurai – 625 002.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal-19),
O/o. Income Tax Department,
New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD).No.13250 of 2021
S.SRIMATHY, J
Nsr
Order made in
W.P.(MD).No.13250 of 2021
27.09.2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.