M/S.yash Raj Films Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income, Central Circle 29, Mumbai
High Court
24 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S.yash Raj Films Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income, Central Circle 29, Mumbai
Date of order
24 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In M/S.yash Raj Films Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income, Central Circle 29, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.697 OF 2003
M/s.Yash Raj Films Private Limited
..Appellant.
VersusDeputy Commissioner of Income, Central Circle 29, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.Poras Kaka, senior Counsel with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the appellant.Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Mr.Suresh Kumar for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 24[th] AUGUST 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard. This appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law :
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal has erred in holding that the Appellant was not entitled to the deduction under Section 80 HHC of the Act in respect of the export of the telecasting rights in the film “Kabhi Kabhi” ?
2.The aforesaid question is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Abdulgafar A. Nadiadwala V/s. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax &Othersreported in 267 ITR 488 (Bom), affirmed by the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. B. Sureshreported in [2009] 313 ITR 149 (SC).
3.In this view of the matter, for the reasons recorded in the judgments cited supra, the appeal is allowed. Accordingly, the question is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.