M/S.zephyr Biomedicals v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Panaji
High Court
20 Oct 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
M/S.zephyr Biomedicals v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Panaji
Date of order
20 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S.zephyr Biomedicals v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Panaji, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2015IN
TAX APPEAL NO. 49 OF 2015
M/S.ZEPHYR BIOMEDICALS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SHRI. NATARAJAN SRIRAM.
VersusTHE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, PANAJI.
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. Chythanya K. K. and Ms. N. Pimenta, Advocates for theapplicant.
Ms. Asha A. Desai, Advocate for the respondent.
-Coram:F. M. REIS &K. L. WADANE, JJ.-Date:20th October, 2015
P.C.
Heard Mr. Chythanya K. K., learned counsel appearing for theapplicant and Ms. Asha A. Desai, learned counsel appearing for therespondent.
2. At this stage the question of granting any stay of theimpugned order would not arise. Liberty to the applicant to apply.
3. The application stands disposed of accordingly.
at*
K. L. WADANE, J.
F. M. REIS, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue