Mukesh Singhvi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-22, Jodhpur
High Court
02 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Mukesh Singhvi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-22, Jodhpur
Date of order
02 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mukesh Singhvi v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-22, Jodhpur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons mentioned in the application, the applicationfor restoration of appeal is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 119 / 2013
in
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.43/2012
Mukesh Singhvi C/o Shri U.C. Jain, Advocate, R/o Hari SinghNagar, Pali Road, Jodhpur.
----PetitionerVersus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CC-22, Jodhpur
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitoner(s) : Mr. Vipul Singhvi
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA
Order
02/03/2017
The instant restoration application was filed by the appellantafter a delay of 30 days.
An application has been filed under Section 5 of LimitationAct for condonation of delay.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the applicationfor condonation of delay is allowed and delay is condoned.
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.43/2012 was dismissed inpursuance of peremptory order passed by this court on18.12.2012.
It is submitted in the application for restoration of appealthat due to health problem of the Advocate, the compliance ofperemptory order was not made.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the applicationfor restoration of appeal is allowed. D.B. Income Tax AppealNo.43/2012 is hereby restored at its original number.
(KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA)J. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS)J.
Ramesh/11
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue