Case Law › High Court › Multiscreen Media Private Limited v. The...

Multiscreen Media Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 11, Mumbai

High Court 13 Jan 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Multiscreen Media Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 11, Mumbai
Date of order
13 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Multiscreen Media Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 11, Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2365 OF 2009 Multiscreen Media Private Limited..Appellant. Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax – 11, Mumbai..Respondent. Mr.Prakash Shah with Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/by PDS Legal for the appellant.Mr.Vimal Gupta for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 13[th] January, 2010. P.C. : 1.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal, inasmuch as the tribunal by its order dated 15[th] June 2009 has recalled the impugned order in respect of Ground Nos. 2 and 3 of the appeal of the revenue in Income Tax Appeal No.6806/Mum/2003. 2.In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan