Case Law › High Court › Mumbai - 400 020 v. M/S.letape (India) P...

Mumbai - 400 020 v. M/S.letape (India) P.ltd

High Court 25 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Jun 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai - 400 020 v. M/S.letape (India) P.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1539 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Mumbai - 400 020. .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Letape (India) P.Ltd. .. Respondent -- Shri R.Ashokan for the Appellant. Shri Sanjiv M.Shah for the Respondent. -- CORAM : SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & SRI P.B.MAJMUDAR, JJ DATED : 25TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. . In view of rejection of the Notice of Motion No.3578 of 2005 for condonation of delay, the present Appeal Lodging No.1539 of 2005 also stands disposed of. ( R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J )

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.