Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai City-10 v. M/S.premier Automobile...

Mumbai City-10 v. M/S.premier Automobiles Ltd

High Court 17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-10 v. M/S.premier Automobiles Ltd
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai City-10 v. M/S.premier Automobiles Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above observation Appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.560 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai City-10.............. ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Premier Automobiles Ltd....Respondent Mr.Salil Kapoor with Mr. Jitendra Singh and Mr. K. Gopal for the Appellant. Mr. A. Kotangale, for respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007 J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 17TH JULY,2007 P.C.: P.C.: . Learned Counsel points out that the main issue is covered by the judgment of this Court in 264 I.T.R.192. However, a perusal of the finding recorded in para.19 as also in para.23 we find that the matter has been remanded to the A.O. for disposal in terms as set out in the judgment. Considering the same we are not inclined to entertain this Appeal on the question of law now formulated. With the above observation Appeal stands disposed of. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan