Case Law › High Court › Mumbai City 11, Mumbai v. Mr. Jatin Rajg...

Mumbai City 11, Mumbai v. Mr. Jatin Rajguru

High Court 11 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Dec 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai City 11, Mumbai v. Mr. Jatin Rajguru, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: As the motion is dismissed, appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No.2479 of 2007. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No.2479 of 2007. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City 11, Mumbai ..Appellant versus Mr. Jatin Rajguru ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite, JJ. R.S.Mohite, JJ. Dated : 11th Dec., 2007 Dated : 11th Dec., 2007 Dated : 11th Dec., 2007 P.C. . As the motion is dismissed, appeal is dismissed. Refund court fees as per rules. (F.I.Rebello, J.) (F.I.Rebello, J.) (F.I.Rebello, J.) (R.S.Mohite, J.) (R.S.Mohite, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.