Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.venus Records & Tapes Pvt.ltd
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.venus Records & Tapes Pvt.ltd
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-11 v. M/S.venus Records & Tapes Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2595 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1055 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai City-11....................Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Venus Records & Tapes Pvt.Ltd...Respondent
Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b.Pankaj Kapoor for the
Appellant.
Mr. K.B. Bhujle, for the respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Heard parties. Considering the cause shown, in our opinion the same amounts to sufficient cause. Hence Motion made absolute clause (a). Office to
register the Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue