Mumbai City-14, Mumbai v. Mr. Suresh K. Lodha
High Court
03 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-14, Mumbai v. Mr. Suresh K. Lodha
Date of order
03 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-14, Mumbai v. Mr. Suresh K. Lodha, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VPH
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 946 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Appellant
Mumbai City-14, Mumbai
Vs
Mr. Suresh K. Lodha ... Respondent
Mr. D. K. Kanwal, for the appellant.
CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, &
V. C. DAGA, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 3, 2008.
P.C.:
----
. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
The learned counsel for the appellant points out that
the Department’s Miscellaneous Application was allowed
by the ITAT and the Tribunal has decided the same in
favour of the Revenue. In view thereof, the learned
counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the
appeal. Leave is granted. Appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn. Permissible court-fee refund be given as
per rules.
Sd/-
[ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
Sd/-
- 2 -
[ V. C. DAGA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue